Legal Opinion

Tripp v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 9, 2004No. 4D03-109PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFarmer, C.J.

We address only the issue concerning the denial of a post-trial interview of a juror. During jury selection the juror in question effectually answered the Judge’s question that he did not know defendant or any members of his family. After the trial was over, defendant learned from his brother that the juror did in fact know him. Defendant’s motion sought a new trial under rule 3.600 on account of juror misconduct.

Under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.600(b)(4), a juror’s breach of duty to disclose information relating to service in a particular ease constitutes misconduct entitling the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. De La Rosa v. ZequeiraSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Roberts Ex Rel. Estate of Roberts v. TejadaSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. Marshall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Villalobos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Bolling v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Casines v. State Farm Florida InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API