Legal Opinion

State v. Lavoie

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 2, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

The defendant, Robert Lavoie, appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Lipez, J.) entered on a jury verdict finding Lavoie guilty of robbery in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 651 (1983). Lavoie’s primary contention is that because M.R.Evid. 410 barred its use, the trial court erred in not granting Lavoie’s motion to suppress his written confession from evidence in his trial for robbery. We hold the trial court properly denied La-voie’s motion and affirm the judgment.

From the evidence at the hearing on the motion to suppress, the trial court could…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Andrew Jackson RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. State v. LittleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. West Valley City v. FieeikiCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  2. State v. Raphfeal Lyfold MyrickWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. Raphfeal Lyfold MyrickWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API