Legal Opinion · Dissent

County of Allegheny v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 2005Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge FRIEDMAN.

I respectfully dissent. The majority reverses an order denying the suspension petition filed by the County of Allegheny, Department of Public Works (Employer). In doing so, the majority concludes that Donald Weis (Claimant) failed to prove that his work injury forced him to retire from the entire labor market. (Majority op. at 1, 5.) I cannot agree.

Our supreme court has stated that, for disability compensation to continue following retirement, claimants must show that they are seeking employment after retirement or that they were forced into retirement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Alpine Group v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API