Legal Opinion

Allen v. Oscar G. Murray Railroad Employes' Benefit Fund

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1920PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Demurrer to complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

The complaint alleges that on August 16, 1915, one Oscar G. Murray was the owner of certain premises in the village of Penn Tan, consisting of a dwelling-house, together with the yard, garden, barn, and other buildings thereto belonging, which premises were occupied by the plaintiff, and that on the day mentioned said Murray leased said premises to the plaintiff by an instrument in writing under seal, a copy of which is annexed to the complaint. The lease is of “ the following described premises: All that house, situate in the Village of Penn Tan, County of Tates and State of New Tork, known…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Witty v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Green v. ArmstrongCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of ChamberlainNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Fagan v. UlrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  5. Goodyear v. VosburghNew York Supreme Court · 1869

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Malone-Barnes v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Malone-Barnes v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API