Legal Opinion

Friends of the Boundary Mountains v. Land Use Regulation Commission

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 5, 2012No. Docket: LUR-11-61PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJabar, J.

[¶ 1] Pursuant to 12 M.R.S. § 689 (2011), Friends of the Boundary Mountains (FBM) appeals from a decision of the Land Use Regulation Commission approving the issuance of a permit to TransCanada Maine Wind Development, Inc. to construct a wind energy facility in Franklin County. FBM argues that LURC erred by (1) denying FBM’s request to reopen a public hearing to consider TransCanada’s amended application; (2) failing to abide by its own procedural rules; (3) ignoring several issues raised by FBM during the administrative proceedings; and (4) finding that TransCanada’s wind energy project will…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Town of RockportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  2. Forest Ecology Network v. Land Use Regulation CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  3. Fichter v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. Sager v. Town of BowdoinhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  5. Schwartz v. Unemployment Insurance CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Michael Fortin v. Jacob TitcombSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  2. Danzig v. Board of Social Worker LicensureSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  3. Jonathan Day v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  4. Michael Fortin v. Jacob TitcombSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API