Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. Atkinson

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 11, 1979No. Civ. 1771PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Circuit Court of Dale County reduced the amount of periodic alimony the husband was required to pay. The husband appeals contending that the trial court erred to reversal in refusing to terminate periodic alimony.

The husband, through able counsel, contends that § 30-2-55, Code of Ala. 1975 (Cum.Supp. 1978), mandates that in this instance the periodic alimony must be terminated. We disagree and affirm.

Section 30-2-55, Code of Ala. 1975 (Cum.Supp. 1978), is as follows:

Any decree of divorce providing for periodic payments of alimony shall be modified by the court to provide for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sutton v. SuttonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  2. Northrup v. NorthrupNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Rubisoff v. RubisoffMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Tillman v. SibblesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Dixie Coaches, Inc. v. RamsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hicks v. HicksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  2. Blackwell v. BlackwellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  3. Peterson v. PetersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  4. Ethridge v. EthridgeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  5. Jones v. JonesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API