Legal Opinion

Uniontown Newspapers, Inc. v. Roberts

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge COLINS.

This case, brought in the Court’s original jurisdiction, has been remanded from the Supreme Court, which affirmed in part and reversed in part a ruling by this Court sustaining Respondent’s preliminary objections and dismissing the underlying complaint. Uni ontown Newspapers, Inc. v. Roberts, 576 Pa. 231, 839 A.2d 185 (2003). The Supreme Court found that two counts of the complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 1 should not be dismissed on preliminary objections because factual issues remained concerning whether Respondent was acting under color of law,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Uniontown Newspapers, Inc. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Dunn v. Board of Property AssessmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Frazier v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API