Legal Opinion

Dickson v. Manhattan Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

' Exceptions of the plaintiff ordered to he heard in the first instance at the Appellate Term.

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.

Upon the trial of the issues in the City Court, after both parties had rested, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and the exceptions were ordered to be heard at the Appellate Term in the first instance and the entry of judgment was suspended in the meantime. The case, therefore, does not come before the Appellate Term upon an appeal but pursuant to the order ordering plaintiff’s exceptions to be heard there in the first instance before judgment.

This at once presents the question whether the Appellate Term as constituted by and under the rules of the Appellate *573Division has jurisdiction to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mason v. BreslinThe Superior Court of New York City · 1870
  2. Halliday v. BarberAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Katz v. Waneta Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  2. Land Brokerage Co. v. HamiltonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915
  3. People v. ArezAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API