Legal Opinion

Dunham v. . Deraismes

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for realignment. (See 165 N. Y. 65.)

1Opinion of the CourtCullen, J.

We have held in our decision that the plaintiff’s annuity was charged on the testator’s land in the hands of his devisees. The complaint does not allege nor has the trial court found any demand on the devisees but only on the executor. The plaintiff suffered years to elapse before bringing this action, the institution of which constitutes the only demand to be found in the record. Gilbert v. Taylor (148 N. Y. 298) is an express authority to the effect that under such circumstances interest should not be allowed prior to the commencement of the action.

Conceding that the real estate of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Larkin v. MannNew York Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jennings v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. In re the Accounting of Guaranty Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API