Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Pate

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 22, 1964No. 1134, MiscPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.

The petitioner, an inmate at the Illinois State Penitentiary, brought an action under 28 U. S. C. § 1343 and 42 U. S. C. § 1983, § 1979 of the Revised Statutes, alleging that solely because of his religious beliefs he was denied permission to purchase certain religious publications and denied other privileges enjoyed by other prisoners. The District Court granted the respondent’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted and the Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Theodore X. A. Sewell v. Paul F. Pegelow, Etc., Joseph X. Watson v. Paul F. Pegelow, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  2. Thomas Cooper v. Frank J. Pate, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cooper v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API