Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 7, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCapotosto, J.

This is a'bill-in equity praying'for the partition óf certain real estate in the city of Pawtucket. By his willy James A. Whalen, late of Pawtucket, deceased, devised an undivided half interest in this property to each of ■his two' daughters, Helena V: Stanton and Mary I. Sullivan, for life,--with remainders on the' death of the survivor of these daughters to their living children. The cause comes to us on the complainants’, appeal from a decree of the-superior court' sustaining a demurrer -by the guardian ad litem of an infant respondent, hereafter referred to in some instances merely as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis v. PerrinoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  2. Genevieve R. Dooling v. Winfred OverholserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  3. Matter of Lindsey C.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Zinni v. ZinniSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  5. Dawson v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API