City of Muskegon v. Slater
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. G-illis, J.
In order-to implement its urban renewal plan, the plaintiff-appellant city of Muskegon filed a petition for condemnation pursuant to CL 1948, § 213.21 et seq. (Stat Ann 1958 Rev § 8.11 et seq.) - Tbe defendants-appellees John D. Shamel and Esther H. Shamel were owners of a lot ultimately condemned in these proceedings.
The circuit judge entered an order permitting the defendants to tax $1,250 for attorney fees against the plaintiff. The parties stipulated that this sum is reasonable in amount.
This case has been submitted upon a stipulated statement of facts and the sole issues are whether CL…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Detroit Edison Co. v. JanoszMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Gundersen v. Village of Bingham FarmsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Muskegon v. SlaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- City of Muskegon v. SlaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1967