Legal Opinion

City of Muskegon v. Slater

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1966No. Docket 404PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. G-illis, J.

In order-to implement its urban renewal plan, the plaintiff-appellant city of Muskegon filed a petition for condemnation pursuant to CL 1948, § 213.21 et seq. (Stat Ann 1958 Rev § 8.11 et seq.) - Tbe defendants-appellees John D. Shamel and Esther H. Shamel were owners of a lot ultimately condemned in these proceedings.

The circuit judge entered an order permitting the defendants to tax $1,250 for attorney fees against the plaintiff. The parties stipulated that this sum is reasonable in amount.

This case has been submitted upon a stipulated statement of facts and the sole issues are whether CL…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Detroit Edison Co. v. JanoszMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Gundersen v. Village of Bingham FarmsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Muskegon v. SlaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. City of Muskegon v. SlaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API