Legal Opinion

Hatzung v. City of Syracuse

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, Onondaga county. Action by Margaret Hatzung against the city of Syracuse and Patrick E. Quinlan. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Per curiam

The purpose of this action was to vacate and set aside a local assessment upon the property of the plaintiff which fronts upon East Water street, in the city of Syracuse. Proceedings were instituted to pave that street, under and in pursuance of which the city entered into a contract therefor. The work was performed by the contractors, and to pay for it the assessment in question was made. The plaintiff contends that the proceedings which resulted in the assessment were irregular in the following-particulars: (1) That the resolution directing the city clerk to advertise for bids did not…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. People Ex Rel. Griffin v. Mayor of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  3. Grenada County Supervisors v. BrogdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Anderson v. Santa AnnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Cromwell v. . MacLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oswego Falls Corp. v. City of FultonNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Loomis v. City of Little FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Jones v. Town of TonawandaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API