Legal Opinion

State v. Bass

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1936No. 26,536. Also Nos. 26,537, 26,538, 26,539, 26,540, 26,541, 26,542, 26,543, and 26,545PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFansler, J.

Appellees were indicted for various violations of the Election Law. To the indictments all appellees filed answers in abatement, specifying eight reasons why the grand jury which returned the indictments was illegally drawn. To these answers the state demurred. The demurrers were sustained as to specifications , 2, 4, 5, and 6 of the answers, and overruled as to specifications 3, 7, and 8.

Error is assigned upon the overruling of the demurrers, and upon the ground that “the court erred in rendering a judgment of acquittal of the appellees herein on their pleas in abatement.”

Specification 3…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Stipp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Rowland v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Shack v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Rudd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Crickmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Anderson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  5. State Ex Rel. Brune v. Vanderburgh Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API