Legal Opinion · Dissent

Woodruff v. Meade County Board of Commissioners

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1995No. 18490, 18491Published

1DissentSabers, Justice

I dissent for all the reasons stated in my dissent in Woodruff v. Meade County (Woodruff I), 522 N.W.2d 771 (S.D.1994). The basis of the circuit court’s decision under SDCL 7-8-30 was factual, and is entitled to due deference from this court. The circuit court decision was right then and still is. Woodruff I was wrong then and still is. Due process and equal protection of the laws require an affirmance of the circuit court, which is a reversal of Woodruff I on this petition for rehearing.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Woodruff v. Meade County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994