Nugent v. Utica Cutlery Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentCantu, Justice
I respectfully dissent. I disagree with the majority’s treatment of appellant’s requested special issues. I would hold that the trial court’s failure to submit these requested issues denied appellant a fair submission of the controlling and ultimate issues in the case as applicable to his alternate recovery theory.
The submitted special issues inquiring whether the knife was manufactured in a defective manner and, if so, was the producing cause of the injury, were based upon Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A (1965). Appellant, however, also plead and offered evidence to support a cause of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Sullivan v. BarnettTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- Texas General Indemnity Co. v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.