Legal Opinion

Cullem v. M. H. Renken Dairy Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 15, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff had judgment in City Court in an action to recover damages for personal injuries, which judgment was affirmed by the Appellate Term. The proof was that as she took a bottle of milk, delivered in the usual manner by defendant, to the faucet in the apartment to wash the bottle something sharp cut her right thumb. Later infection followed, causing serious injuries. There was no direct proof that the bottle was in any way defective. The defendant made proof of thorough inspection of these bottles from the time that they were returned from customers until they were cleaned, filled…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Field v. Empire Case Goods Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. Kerwin v. Chippewa Shoe Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Jaroniec v. C. O. Hasselbarth, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dressler v. Merkel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. Cleary v. John M. Maris Co.New York Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Boyd v. American Can Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Rosenblum v. Thatcher Glass Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Poplar v. Bourjois, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API