Legal Opinion
Blye v. Colonial Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 21, 1984PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kupferman, J. P.
The issue on this appeal is whether the Statute of Frauds is satisfied by a letter sent by one of the defendants-respondents to plaintiffs-appellants. We hold that the letter satisfies the statute, and accordingly, reverse.
Plaintiffs-appellants Mark Blye and Paul Sklar brought this action to recover a commission or finder’s fee claimed *298under an alleged contract with defendant-respondent Colonial Corp. of America. According to the complaint, defendant-respondent American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. (ABC), as exclusive licensing agent for indorsements by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Morris Cohon & Co. v. RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Minichiello v. Royal Business Funds Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Yonkers v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Newman v. Crazy Eddie, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Springwell Corp. v. Falcon Drilling Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Davis & Mamber, Ltd. v. Adrienne Vittadini, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- City Of Yonkers v. Otis Elevator CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.