Grossman v. Rude, No. Fa90 027 17 67 S (Feb. 9, 1996)

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTIONSTO MODIFY, REOPEN (NO. 169.09) AND CLARIFY (NO. 170.09) The defendant has moved that the court modify that part of its decision which ordered the parties to share the cost of the child's travel, pay their own counsel fees and pay one-half of the CT Page 1414-J child's counsel's fees. It further ordered that no child support be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant because of the defendant's lack of income.

That is a somewhat disingenuous statement. The plaintiff did have…