Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 1, 1918No. 4846PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL.

May I, 1918.

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

udge. On a former day of the term thisappeal was dismissed on account of the escape of appellant. This was ! made to appear satisfactory to the court at the time. Motion is made ; to reinstate the appeal. The facts show, both in the motion to reinstate | and the original showing, that defendant had escaped; that he broke jail near midnight and was captured by the sheriff the next day some j time about twelve miles from the jail from which he escaped. There is | nothing to indicate in the motion that it was his purpose to…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holliday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Davenport v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API