Gilbert v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL.
May I, 1918.
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
udge. On a former day of the term thisappeal was dismissed on account of the escape of appellant. This was ! made to appear satisfactory to the court at the time. Motion is made ; to reinstate the appeal. The facts show, both in the motion to reinstate | and the original showing, that defendant had escaped; that he broke jail near midnight and was captured by the sheriff the next day some j time about twelve miles from the jail from which he escaped. There is | nothing to indicate in the motion that it was his purpose to…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Holliday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Davenport v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926