Legal Opinion

McRae v. Camden & Rockland Water Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 13, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Herein the plaintiff recovered a verdict for $2,000 for injuries to his golf course in Rockland. The defendant filed a general motion based on the usual grounds. The question is whether the verdict is manifestly wrong.

From the evidence the jury could have found that many years ago the defendant took title to a rectangular piece of land 25 by 40 feet in the midst of property owned by its grant- or; that it built a valve house thereon over a pit dug in the ground; that in the fall of 1939 the defendant artificially col*112lected surface water in the pit to varying depths, it coming in around pipes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. PrestonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
  2. Goodwin v. Texas Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. Harris v. Woodlands ClubSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  3. Irving Eliasberg, Inc. v. RooseveltSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API