Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Epstein v. Kutner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 1972PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In an action to recover money damages and personal property upon various causes of action, including fraud and conversion, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 25, 1971, which granted Ms motion to open his default on the trial and to restore the ease to the Trial Calendar, upon certain conditions. Order modified by striking therefrom subparagraph “2” of the first decretal paragraph, namely, the condition that $50,000 or a surety bond be deposited in court, and by adding thereto a provision that the default judgment shall stand as security. As so…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Capellino Abattoir, Inc. v. LiebermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Rawson v. AustinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API