Williams v. State

It is evident that the appeal in this case was for delay. The appellant when arraigned in the lower court interposed a plea of guilty to the offense of violating the prohibition law upon which he was adjudged guilty, but, notwithstanding this, he appealed from the judgment of conviction. He had this right, however. Wright’s Case, 209 Ala. 374, 96 So. 316.

The record upon which this appeal is rested is regular and without error, and the cause is affirmed.

Affirmed.