Legal Opinion

Hogg v. Mackay

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1893PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Benton County; Martin L. Pipes, Judge. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

This is a suit by T. Edgerton Hogg, receiver of the Willamette Valley & Coast Railroad Company, to enjoin the sheriff of Benton County from collecting or attempting to collect the state and county taxes assessed and levied upon the property of the said railroad company for the year 1889, and involves the constitutionality of section 11 of “An act to provide for the construction of the Willamette Valley & Coast Railroad,” approved October 24, 1874 (Laws 1874, 51), as extended by the act approved February 5, 1885 (Laws 1885, 7), which reads as follows; “Section 11. That if said Willamette…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. McCreeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Huntington v. WorthenSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Home of the Friendless v. RouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio R. Co. v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Humphrey v. PeguesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hughes v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Opinion of the Justices To the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. State Ex Rel. Hostetter v. HuntOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Sheppard v. Hidalgo CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Sheppard v. Hidalgo CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API