Legal Opinion

Pepe v. Township of Plainsboro

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 26, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

766 A.2d 837 (2001)

337 N.J. Super. 209

Michael PEPE and Paula Pepe, his wife, Plaintiffs,

v.

TOWNSHIP OF PLAINSBORO, Plainsboro Department of Public Works, a body corporate and politic, their agent, servants and/or employees; Kenneth Giovanelli, his agents, servants and/or employees; A.J. O'Sullivan, P.A., its agents, servants and/or employees; and Melick-Tully and Associates, Inc., its agents, servants and/or employees, Defendants, and

Riefolo Construction Co., Inc., its agent, servants and/or employees, Defendant-Appellant, and

Wagner-Hohns-Inglis, Inc., its agents, servants and/or employees,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carvalho v. Toll Bros. and DevelopersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Ramos v. Browning Ferris Industries of South Jersey, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Lieberman v. Employers Ins. of WausauSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Lowe v. ZarghamiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  5. Doloughty v. Blanchard Const. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Azurak v. Corporate Prop. InvestorsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  2. Eva Migliore v. Vision Solar LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025
  3. Eva Migliore v. Vision Solar LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API