Legal Opinion

City of Dayton v. Christian Moerlein Brewing Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 29, 1917Published

Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

There was in force in the city of Dayton at the time of the institution of this prosecution an ordinance providing in section one that “No person shall deal in, sell, barter, exchange, give or deliver to another any spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors in the city of Dayton, Kentucky, without first having obtained a license so to do as hereinafter set out.” Another section of the ordinance *2fixed the license tax “To sell or deliver by wholesale from vehicles or other conveyances in kegs, barrels or cases in quantities not less than five gallons” at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Adams Express Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Kirmeyer v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Adams Express Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Rossi v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. City of Newport v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API