Legal Opinion
Adorable Coat Co. v. Connecticut Indemnity Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 31, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sullivan, J.
Plaintiff, a manufacturer and importer of women’s apparel, was insured with defendant against all risks of direct physical loss, except as excluded, under a "manufacturers output policy”, which provided $125,000 in coverage at any one location at certain specifically designated locations, including its Van Brunt warehouse located in Elizabeth, New Jersey.
Plaintiff, primarily located at 85 Tenth Avenue, in New York City, operated its business out of a number of locations; in addition, it stored merchandise at various locations including the Van Brunt warehouse.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bretton v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Bretton v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Pergament Distributors, Inc. v. Old Republic InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wider v. Heritage Maintenance, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2007
- Charnowitz v. GEICOAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Connolly v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Zurich American InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Grand Metro Transit Mix Corp. v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.