Legal Opinion

Pemberton v. Dharmani

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1991No. Docket 118982PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrennan, J.

Plaintiffs appeal by leave granted from a June 22, 1989, order granting partial summary disposition for defendant B.N. Zarewych, D.O. Plaintiffs filed the instant medical-malpractice action after Denise Pemberton’s colon was mistakenly transected instead of her fallopian tube during a tubal-ligation procedure, resulting in the need for her to have a colostomy. We reverse.

The basic facts are not in dispute. In October 1987, Denise Pemberton decided to undergo a voluntary tubal ligation. After commencement of the surgery, Sheela Dharmani, M.D., the surgeon, noted several pelvic adhesions.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Giddings v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Petaja v. GuckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Niggeling v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Admiral Insurance v. Columbia Casualty InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Hutchinson v. Allegan County Board of Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Pemberton v. DharmaniMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Hunters Pointe Partners Ltd. Partnership v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Shellum v. Michigan Employment Security CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API