Pemberton v. Dharmani
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBrennan, J.
Plaintiffs appeal by leave granted from a June 22, 1989, order granting partial summary disposition for defendant B.N. Zarewych, D.O. Plaintiffs filed the instant medical-malpractice action after Denise Pemberton’s colon was mistakenly transected instead of her fallopian tube during a tubal-ligation procedure, resulting in the need for her to have a colostomy. We reverse.
The basic facts are not in dispute. In October 1987, Denise Pemberton decided to undergo a voluntary tubal ligation. After commencement of the surgery, Sheela Dharmani, M.D., the surgeon, noted several pelvic adhesions.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Giddings v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Petaja v. GuckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Niggeling v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- Admiral Insurance v. Columbia Casualty InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Hutchinson v. Allegan County Board of Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Pemberton v. DharmaniMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Hunters Pointe Partners Ltd. Partnership v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Shellum v. Michigan Employment Security CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.