Stevens v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Judge.
The appellant challenges his conviction for grand theft of an automobile. He argues that his post-trial motion for judgment of acquittal should have been granted because the state did not prove that a written demand for return of the leased automobile was made, as required by section 812.014(3), Florida Statutes (1993). We agree and reverse.
*570Section 812.014(3), a subsection of the theft statute, provides:(3)Failure to comply with the terms of a lease when the lease is for a term of 1 year or longer shall iiot constitute a violation of this section unless demand for the return of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Baeumel v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
- State v. RobargeSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1997