Legal Opinion

Stevens v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 12, 1996No. 95-2359PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Judge.

The appellant challenges his conviction for grand theft of an automobile. He argues that his post-trial motion for judgment of acquittal should have been granted because the state did not prove that a written demand for return of the leased automobile was made, as required by section 812.014(3), Florida Statutes (1993). We agree and reverse.

*570Section 812.014(3), a subsection of the theft statute, provides:(3)Failure to comply with the terms of a lease when the lease is for a term of 1 year or longer shall iiot constitute a violation of this section unless demand for the return of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Baeumel v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
  3. State v. RobargeSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  4. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  5. Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API