Legal Opinion

Berenbroick v. Hofstetter

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 13, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On final hearing on pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Chancellor.

This is a suit for specific performance. The complainant agreed to sell and convey to the defendants lands in Hudson county, by deed of general warranty free from all encumbrances except a certain mortgage. The defendants refuse to conclude the purchase by accepting a deed from the complainant,■alleging in their answer that—

“The complainant cannot convey to defendants the premises in fee-simple by full covenant and warranty deed, free and clear of all encumbrances, except a mortgage of $4,000, according to the terms of the contract, for the reason that there is an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shalvoy v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex-Cell-O Corp. v. Farmers Coop. Dairies Ass'n.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. LodzinskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  3. Gondas v. GondasNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  4. Lintott v. McCluskeyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API