Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Halvorson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 20, 1980No. 35853, CA 17516PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.

Husband appeals from a decree in this dissolution proceeding which granted the wife 76 percent of the marital assets, including all of the real property-held by the parties. Wife cross-appeals, contending that the trial court erred in not awarding her spousal support. We find merit in both appeals and modify the decree.

Husband, 54, and wife, 50, were married April 24, 1953. Husband has been a plumber for the past 15 years. Although he has been working steadily during the past year, his employment can become sporadic, depending on the economic climate of the building industry. As a union…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. In re the Marriage of FrishkoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. In re the Marriage of GlattCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of PierceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. In re the Marriage of HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. In re the Marriage of SandsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. In re the Marriage of HackleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API