Legal Opinion

Niukkanen v. McAlexander

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1959No. 15990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.

In this habeas corpus proceeding petitioner seeks to invalidate an order for his deportation as an alien who had been a member of the Communist party. After a hearing in the district court, an order was entered dismissing his application. Petitioner appeals, contending that he was not shown to have a “meaningful” association with the Communist party, as that term is used in Rowoldt v. Perfetto, 355 U.S. 115, 120, 78 S.Ct. 180, 2 L.Ed.2d 140. He also argues that the act under which he was ordered deported is unconstitutional.1

*826Petitioner, -whom we shall call Mackie, is a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Galvan v. PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Schaffer Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Rowoldt v. PerfettoSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Arnold Schleich, Alias Joseph Ring v. James W. Butterfield, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  5. Jose Angel Ocon v. Albert Del Guercio, Acting Officer in Charge of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Los Angeles, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gastelum-Quinones v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Hamish Scott MacKay Apellant v. Eugene D. McAlexander Acting District Director, District 31, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Niukkanen v. McalexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API