Legal Opinion

State v. Marryott

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1993No. 92AP-1035PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Petree, Judge.

Defendant, Lawrence R. Marryott, Jr., appeals his conviction from the Franklin County Municipal Court of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated with a greater breath-alcohol content than permitted by R.C. 4511.19(A)(3). On appeal, the assignment of error he has presented for review states:

“The trial court erred, to the prejudice of appellant, in admitting the results of appellant’s chemical breath test without requiring the prosecution to first introduce foundational evidence as to the test’s reliability.”

Defendant was stopped by police on Woody Hayes Drive near the Ohio…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Defiance v. KretzOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. City of Cincinnati v. SandOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. DvorakOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. YoungOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API