Legal Opinion

Hartough v. Safeway Lines, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1939No. Docket No. 38, Calendar No. 40,216PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

North, J.

Upon our original hearing of this trespass case it was reversed for the sole reason that the damages awarded for personal injuries, et cetera, were excessive. Contrary to the usual practice in this court no provision was made for affirmance conditioned upon remittitur of damages by plaintiff in a specified amount. Upon this rehearing plaintiff asks this court, if it still considers the damages excessive, to “state a sum to be remitted on condition of affirmance.”

Review of this court’s decisions will disclose that in cases wherein the only ground for reversal is that of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Crippen v. ChattertonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Peter Bill & Associates, Inc v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. McDill v. McDonald Cooperative Dairy Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Bahlman v. Hudson Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API