Legal Opinion

United States v. Gahagan Dredging Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 14, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKS, District Judge.

The United States of 'America brings this action to recover a statutory penalty alleged to be due by reason of defendant allowing its vessels to be navigated on the high seas without first obtaining the certificate of inspection required by 46 U.S.C.A. § 395.

The instant motion is by the United States for an order vacating and quashing the defendant’s notice to take the testimony of “the plaintiff by its Officer familiar with the matters alleged in the complaint * * *." Movant contends that such notice fails to meet the requirements set forth by Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spaeth v. WarNer Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  2. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp. v. Distillers Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paparelli v. Prudential InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
  2. Frederick Snare Corp. v. Moran Towing & Transportation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  3. Plantation-Simon Inc. v. BahloulDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Shenker v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API