Legal Opinion

Tekansky v. Pearson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 6, 1994No. 1-93-1649PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE MURRAY

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff brought this action to recover bodily injury damages sustained as a result of the alleged negligence of the defendant in operating a motor vehicle. Following a jury trial, at which the defendant did not appear, the jury awarded judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in the amount of $25,046.79, plus costs.

The sole issue presented for review is whether the trial court erred in submitting Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions, Civil, No. 5.01 (3d ed. 1989) (hereinafter IPI Civil 3d No. 5.01).

On July 3, 1990,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago Housing Authority v. RoseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. People v. ChamberlainAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. Robles v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Tir v. ShearnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  5. Wyman-Gordon Co. v. BernardiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Midwest Builder Distributing, Inc. v. Lord and Essex, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. Village of Mundelein v. ThompsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. In Re Marriage of AbmaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Gehrett v. Chrysler Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. Crane v. Admiral Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API