Legal Opinion

Baltzell v. Nosler

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1855PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Marion District Court. This suit whs brought by Baltzell and others against Nosler, on a judgment rendered in the state of Indiana. Judgment was rendered against the defendant. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J. (1)

This action was brought on a judgment recovered in Indiana, which was rendered on confession, by one Edward W. McGaughey, by virtue of a warrant of attorney. ' The record is in great confusion, and it is difficult to ascertain the true state of the case. One thing, however, appears, which is the only one which we will attempt to decide. The defendant denies the authority of McGraughey to appear and confess. Among the papers there is no denial of this matter; but there is a demurrer to it, and the demurrer is sustained. The connection between this answer and this demurrer, is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mills v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  2. Hampton v. M'connelSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  3. Borden v. FitchNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  4. Bissell v. BriggsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  5. Starbuck v. MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 1830

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hirsch Bros. & Co. v. R. E. Kennington Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Hall v. CudahySupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  3. Struble v. MaloneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  4. Rawson v. GuibersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API