Legal Opinion
City of Tucson v. Mills
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 5, 1976No. 2 CA-CIV 2154PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment ordering that the decision of the Civil Service Commission, upholding the suspension of appellee Mills, be set aside and that appellee be provided with his previously suspended credentials and be reinstated as an employee of the Parks and Recreation Department of the City of Tucson.
The facts of the case are as follows. Appellee, a duly qualified and permanent employee of the City of Tucson, was serving in the capacity of a parks guard at the time of his suspension on November 1, 1973. On November 21, 1973, Mills was served with a personnel…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- English v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Pennsylvania State Athletic Commission v. BrattonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- CIVIL SERV. COM'N OF CITY OF TUCSON v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Woerth v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Cohen v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Chapman v. Ohio State Dental BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- Caldwell v. Arizona State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Ontiveros v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.