Legal Opinion

Claim of Giaquinto v. Major Sanitation, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 14, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Casey, J.

On this appeal, the employer and its carrier contend that the refusal of the board to subject the respondent widow’s “mother’s benefits”, received by her under the Social Security Act (US Code, tit 42, § 402, subd [g], par [1]), to the offset provisions of subdivision 2-a of section 16 of the Workers’ Compensation Law is erroneous, as a matter of law. It is undisputed that the decedent husband, a 41-year-old corporation president, was killed by an unknown assailant in the course of his employment and that he left the widow and two infant children surviving him.

Sepa…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Claim of Thomas v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. L.E.L. Construction v. GoodeColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Claim of Washington v. Vogue Metalcraft, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Claim of Kallir v. Friendly Ice CreamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API