Farrell v. Rammelkamp
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. P. E. Flit or apt, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.
The plaintiff’s cause of action is stated in two counts. In the first he seeks to recover on a special tax bill issued by the municipal authorities of the city of St. Louis for' repairs on a sidewalk in front *426of a lot in the city belonging to the defendants. The tax bill is dated November 13, 1893, and is for $84.45, the price of one hundred and forty square yards of new paving material; and it states that it was issued for' repairs on the sidewalk. The further allegations were made that the street commissioner of the city notified the defendant Rammelkamp (as provided by section 573 of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Farrar v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Stadler v. RothSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kansas City v. PorterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
- Noel v. SummitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- Granite Bituminous Paving Co. v. Parkview Realty & Improvement Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1918
- Barrie v. the Richmond CemeteryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926
- Ranney v. City of Cape GirardeauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.