Legal Opinion
Kalish v. Kalish
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 24, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel H. Hofstadter, J.
The action is for a separation. On this application plaintiff wife seeks an order substituting Saul 0. Kauder, Esq., as her attorney in place and stead of Paltrow & Jensen, and directing the latter to deliver all papers in the action in their possession to superseding counsel.
This action was commenced about August 31, 1956, at which time plaintiff was represented by the firm of Lyman & Tenenbaum. By order dated October 10, 1956, the late Justice Lynch fixed temporary alimony at $50 per week and counsel fee at $500. Thereafter Paltrow & Jensen were substituted for Lyman & Tenenbaum, at which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dunn v. Hudson River Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Turner v. . WoolworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- In Re the Estate of MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- In Re the Accounting of the United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Levine v. LevineNew York Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spinello v. SpinelloNew York Supreme Court · 1972
- Schwartz v. SchwartzNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Owen v. ForchelliCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964