Legal Opinion

Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C. v. City of Palos Verdes Estates

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 15, 2007No. 05-56106Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER CLARIFYING REQUEST THAT THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA DECIDE A QUESTION OF CALIFORNIA LAW

KIM McLANE WARDLAW, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

On May 8, 2007, we respectfully requested that the Supreme Court of California decide the question of whether California Public Utilities Code §§ 7901 and 7901.1 permit public entities to regulate the placement of telephone equipment in public rights of way on aesthetic grounds.

On August 15, 2007, pursuant to California Rule of Court 8.548(f)(5), the California Supreme Court requested that we clarify our question in light of the significance, if any, of our…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sprint Telephony Pcs, L.P. v. County Of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API