Legal Opinion

Associated Merchandising Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 17, 1940No. C. D. 339Published

1Opinion of the Court

Tilson, Judge:

This suit against the United States raises the question of the proper classification of certain imported merchandise and *264seeks to recover certain money alleged to have been illegally exacted by reason of such classification. Duty was levied on the merchandise at 90 per centum under paragraph 1529 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and the plaintiff claims the same to be properly dutiable at 40 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 923 of said act, as manufactures wholly or in chief value of cotton, not specially provided for.

The collector has furnished no indication of how the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Field & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. National Hat Pin Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. United States v. Bennett & LoewenthalCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. United States v. HannevigCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  5. Heyliger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API