Legal Opinion

Collins v. City of El Campo

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided October 25, 1984No. 13-83-528-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

UTTER, Justice.

Three sets of plaintiffs (The City of El Campo (City), Subdivision Plaintiffs and Non-Subdivision Plaintiffs) brought suit against appellants to permanently enjoin the use of the Collins’ property as a residence for four unrelated, mentally retarded men and their supervising houseparents. The City and the Non-Subdivision Plaintiffs, who own four homes in a neighboring subdivision and within close proximity to the Collins’ property, claimed that the use of the residence as a “group home” violated the City’s zoning ordinance. The Subdivision Plaintiffs, who own eight homes…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RoloffTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Citizens Bank of Bryan v. First State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Mongony v. BevilacquaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  5. Bolton v. SparksTexas Supreme Court · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Blevins v. Barry-Lawrence County Ass'n for Retarded CitizensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  2. City of Coppell v. General Homes Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  3. Deep East Texas Regional Mental Health & Mental Retardation Services v. Kinnear, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1994
  4. Tien Tao Ass'n, Inc. v. Kingsbridge Park Community Ass'n, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  5. Permian Basin Centers for Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. Alsobrook, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API