Legal Opinion
Maurice v. Maurice
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 2010PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to compel the determination of claims to certain real property the plaintiff appeals (1), as limited by his reply brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated May 19, 2009, as, upon granting the defendants’ motion for leave to enter a default judgment on the counterclaims upon his failure to serve a reply to the counterclaims, declared that a deed dated December 29, 1999, purporting to grant a fee inter*793est in the subject property, is a nullity, and directed the Office of the City Register of the City of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Beizer v. FunkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- MMG Design, Inc. v. MelnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Twersky v. KasaksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by7 opinions
- U.S. Bank N.A. v. BhimsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- KI 12, LLC v. JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Diuccio v. SorenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Davis v. DurandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- Diuccio v. SorenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.