Hancock v. Thornhill
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from decree of the Corporation Court of the city of Lynchburg. Decree for the complainant. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.
The material facts disclosed by this record are these: Prior to the year 1888, the lots in question, and other *104property located in the city of Lynchburg, belonged to Ammon G. Hancock, who devised the same to his wife for life, with remainder in fee to his four children, namely, James Hancock, Lilly H. Thornhill, Ernest J. Hancock and Edwin A. Hancock. The two lots involved fronted on Cabell street and extended back between parallel lines to Blackwater street. On each of these lots was located a large tobacco factory; the buildings being separated by an open space forty-eight or fifty feet in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Turner v. South & West Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1916
3Cited by2 opinions
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. HardySupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
- Whitmore v. Margaret Paxton Memorial for Convalescent ChildrenCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928