Legal Opinion

Showers v. Merchants National Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1928No. Appeal, 112PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Schaeeee,

Plaintiff, a depositor in defendant bank, brought suit against it to recover the amount represented by four checks which he had drawn on it in payment for stock in a rubber company, claiming that the bank had paid the checks on forged endorsements and that he had never received the certificates of stock. The verdict was in plaintiff’s favor, the court entered judgment for defendant and from this action plaintiff appeals.

A single proposition controls the case. When plaintiff received his settled bank book from defendant with the checks in question returned to him…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McNeely Co. v. Bank of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. United States v. National Bank of Commerce of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  3. Kearny v. Metropolitan Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Roth v. CrissySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  5. Rick v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. SobleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  2. Interstate Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. First National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Stauffer Stauffer v. GebhardtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Georges Township School District CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Johnson v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API