People v. Hays
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTT, j.
On appeal from an order revoking probation, the issue is whether the defendant’s probation was revoked without a proper hearing and determination of his mental competence pursuant to sections 1367, 1368, and 1369 of the Penal Code. Defendant contends there was substantial evidence of doubt as to his mental competence and, therefore, the trial court erred in denying his right to a jury trial to determine his mental competence. (Pate v. Robinson (1966) 383 U.S. 375 [15 L.Ed.2d 815, 86 S.Ct. 836]; People v. Laudermilk (1967) 67 Cal.2d 272 [61 Cal.Rptr. 644, 431 P.2d 228]; People…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. PenningtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. BeivelmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. LaudermilkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Tarantino v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. MixonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. ClaxtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.