Legal Opinion

United States v. Selman

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 22, 1989No. ACM S27978Published

1Opinion of the Court

*629DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

Airman Basic Selman was a prisoner at Hurlburt Field, Florida. Despite his pleas, he was found guilty by a special court-martial of disobedience of a superior commissioned officer, assault, and perjury, violations of Articles 90,128, and 131, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 890, 928, 931. Before us, he mounts an attack on all charges, arguing that the evidence is insufficient to sustain findings of guilty as to each.

Willful Disobedience

We agree with the appellant that his conduct did not violate Article 90. After a determination to place him in minimum custody status, Airman…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Jesse J. Avila, Guardian Ad Litem of Daniel Cardona v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Gerard Fredrick Lisk, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  4. Rolland L. King and Arlene P. King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. LoosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API