Legal Opinion

Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. First Republicbank Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1995No. 92-1662PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We reversed the judgment of the district court with opinion at 997 F.2d 39 (5th Cir. 1993), and the Supreme Court affirmed by an equally divided vote. Our mandate has not been issued to the district court. The Supreme Court has now held § 27A(b) to be an unconstitutional breach of separation of powers. Plant v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 1447, 131 L.Ed.2d 328 (1995). Under that decision the claims of plaintiff are barred, and the district court would be unable to do more than repeat its prior judgment. Therefore, our opinion and judgment are vacated, and the judgment of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. First RepublicBank Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company v. First Republicbank CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API